Abstracting and Indexing
Web Site of Urooncology Association
E-ISSN: 2667-4610
About Us
Journal History
Aims and Scope
Abstracting and Indexing
Editorial Board
Recruitment of Editors
Roles and Responsibilities
Editorial Board
Journal Policies
Advertising
Allegations of Misconduct
Appeals and Complaints
Archiving and Preservation
Article Processing Charges (APC)
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Authorship and Contributorship
Conflicts of Interest
Copyright and Licensing
Data Availability and Reproducibility
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA)
Editorial Oversight
Ethical Misconduct
Open Access
Peer Review Policy
Post Publication Discussions
Research Ethics
Instructions to Authors
Instructions to Authors
Instructions for Reviewers
Ethical Policy
Peer Review Process
Contact Us
Do Length and Tumor Grades of Positive Surgical Margin Have an Impact on Biochemical Recurrence After Prostatectomy?
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Articles
VOLUME: 16 ISSUE: 3
P: 86 - 91
September 2017
Do Length and Tumor Grades of Positive Surgical Margin Have an Impact on Biochemical Recurrence After Prostatectomy?
Bull Urooncol 2017;16(3):86-91
DOI:
10.4274/uob.859
Murat Yavuz Koparal
1
Cenk Acar
2
Betül Ögüt
3
Eda Tokat
1
Fatih Bıçaklıoğlu
4
İpek Işık Gönül
3
Ali Furkan Batur
5
Tevfik Sinan Sözen
1
Author Information
Copyright & Licence Information
Galenos & Bull Urooncol Disclaimer
1.
Gazi Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi, Üroloji Anabilim Dali, Ankara, Türkiye
2.
Özel Eryaman Hastanesi, Üroloji Klinigi, Ankara, Türkiye
3.
Gazi Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi, Tibbi Patoloji Anabilim Dali, Ankara, Türkiye
4.
Izmit Seka Devlet Hastanesi, Üroloji Klinigi, Kocaeli, Türkiye
5.
Dr. Nafiz Körez Sincan Devlet Hastanesi, Üroloji Klinigi, Ankara, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date:
08.04.2017
Accepted Date:
18.08.2017
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Keywords:
Radical prostatectomy, positive surgical margin, Gleason grade